id	summary	reporter	owner	description	type	status	priority	milestone	component	version	resolution	keywords	cc
19653	Find more conflicting keys in lanes-tagging	skyper	team	"Follow-up of #10932 and #19609.

==== What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Have highway with `lanes=1` and `turn:lanes=left;through|right`
1. Run Validator


==== What is the expected result?
Warning about missing `oneway=yes` or missing postfix ""forward/backward"" with `*:lanes=*`

==== What happens instead?
No warning

==== Please provide any additional information below. Attach a screenshot if possible.
See [attachment:ticket:19609:josm_19609_lanes_tagging_samples.osm josm_19609_lanes_tagging_samples.osm] for some examples with even number of `lanes=*`

Additionally, if `*:lanes[:*]=*` has more values than `lanes[:*]=*` a `VEHICLE_TYPE:lanes[:*]=*` is needed.

Watch out for `source:lanes=*` and for `change:lanes=no|no` which is valid for a highway with exactly one lane per direction.


{{{
Relative:URL: ^/trunk
Repository:UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b
Last:Changed Date: 2020-08-07 18:58:40 +0200 (Fri, 07 Aug 2020)
Revision:16853
Build-Date:2020-08-08 01:30:49
URL:https://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk
}}}
"	enhancement	new	normal		Core validator			template_report lanes-tagging conflicting keys