id	summary	reporter	owner	description	type	status	priority	milestone	component	version	resolution	keywords	cc
15536	Bad validation & fixes around unisex toilets	rorym	team	"The JOSM validator is incorrect for toilets w.r.t. unisex. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unisex_public_toilet Unisex toilet] mean a toilet which is used/usable by all genders, not just male and female, i.e. one facility/room used by all genders.

 * An `amenity=toilets` with the tags `unisex=yes` `male=yes` `female=yes` causes a validation error, with a suggested fix of removing the `male` and `female` tags. But if a toilet facility had 3 separate types of toilets (male, female, and unisex), then this ""fix"" would change the meaning to mean that there is only one type of toilet, the unisex one.

 * An `amenity=toilets` with the tags `unisex=yes` `male=yes` and no `female` tag causes a validation error, or one with `unisex=yes` `female=yes` and no `male` tag.

There are some instances where ""unisex"" means ""all genders are served together"", like hairdressers, or clothes shops. But there are other where it means ""there is no segregation"", which is different from ""there is a male thing and a female thing and they are separated"". A unisex toilet is not the same as a male toilet and a female toilet.

I don't know of any toilets which has 3 kinds (or unisex and one other), but the world is big and trans rights are ever improving, so it might happen. But to mark things as errors, and ""fix"" the data by breaking the data is wrong. As I fix, I suggest removing the validation checks which look at the combination of `male`/`female`/`unisex`."	defect	closed	normal	17.11	Core validator		fixed	amenity toilet gender