4840601 https://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/notes/4840601 https://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/notes/4840601/comment https://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/notes/4840601/close 2025-07-05 20:23:47 UTC open 2025-07-05 20:23:47 UTC 13630589 ‮‮‮‮‮‮‮ https://api.openstreetmap.org/user/%E2%80%AE%E2%80%AE%E2%80%AE%E2%80%AE%E2%80%AE%E2%80%AE%E2%80%AE opened No road, cant ride by bicycle #OsmAnd <p dir="auto">No road, cant ride by bicycle </p> <p dir="auto">#OsmAnd</p> 2025-12-21 02:42:55 UTC 52552 Matija Nalis https://api.openstreetmap.org/user/Matija%20Nalis commented the way to the north is already marked as (off-road) path, not as road. Suitability seems to be dependent on the bicycle time, it is mapped as `mtb:scale=0` so at least if you're riding MTB it should be passable if that is correct? Or are you saying it is some higher https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale ? Which one? <p dir="auto">the way to the north is already marked as (off-road) path, not as road.</p> <p dir="auto">Suitability seems to be dependent on the bicycle time, it is mapped as <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:`mtb:scale=0`" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" dir="auto">`mtb:scale=0`</a> so at least if you're riding MTB it should be passable if that is correct? Or are you saying it is some higher <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" dir="auto">mtb:scale=*</a> ? Which one? </p> 2025-12-21 03:00:17 UTC 13630589 ‮‮‮‮‮‮‮ https://api.openstreetmap.org/user/%E2%80%AE%E2%80%AE%E2%80%AE%E2%80%AE%E2%80%AE%E2%80%AE%E2%80%AE commented Not sure that it's passable, there was no visible way, maybe overgrown with grass <p dir="auto">Not sure that it's passable, there was no visible way, maybe overgrown with grass</p>