| 1 | /* See JOSM #22822 - runway heading validator by gaben */
|
|---|
| 2 |
|
|---|
| 3 | /* raising error only if {first designator >= the second designator} */
|
|---|
| 4 | way[aeroway=runway][ref =~ /^([0-9]{1,3}[LCRWSGHU]? ?[-,;\/\\] ?[0-9]{1,3}[LCRWSGHU]?)$/][eval(to_int(get(regexp_match("^([0-9]+)[LCRWSGHU]? ?[-,;\\/] ?([0-9]+)[LCRWSGHU]?$", tag("ref")), 1)) >= to_int(get(regexp_match("^([0-9]+)[LCRWSGHU]? ?[-,;\\/] ?([0-9]+)[LCRWSGHU]?$", tag("ref")), 2)))] {
|
|---|
| 5 | group: tr("runway reference");
|
|---|
| 6 | set runwayDesignatorOrderIssue;
|
|---|
| 7 | /* throwError: tr("designators should be in increasing order"); add this line to pass tests... I think it's a bug */
|
|---|
| 8 | assertMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=02-01";
|
|---|
| 9 | assertMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=\"2- 1\"";
|
|---|
| 10 | assertMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=\"2 - 1\"";
|
|---|
| 11 | assertMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=36/18";
|
|---|
| 12 | /* assertMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=\"36\18\""; not working yet :( */
|
|---|
| 13 | assertMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=36W-17W";
|
|---|
| 14 | assertMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=01/01";
|
|---|
| 15 | assertNoMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=17W-36W";
|
|---|
| 16 | assertNoMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=01- 02";
|
|---|
| 17 | assertNoMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=03H/12H";
|
|---|
| 18 | assertNoMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=01-19";
|
|---|
| 19 | assertNoMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=3/21";
|
|---|
| 20 | assertNoMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=09L/27R";
|
|---|
| 21 | }
|
|---|
| 22 |
|
|---|
| 23 | /* raising error only if {second designator - first designator != 18} [global version] */
|
|---|
| 24 | way[aeroway=runway][ref =~ /^([0-9]{1,2}[LCRWSGHU]? ?[-,;\/\\] ?[0-9]{1,2}[LCRWSGHU]?)$/][eval(to_int(get(regexp_match("^([0-9]+)[LCRWSGHU]? ?[-,;\\/] ?([0-9]+)[LCRWSGHU]?$", tag("ref")), 2)) - to_int(get(regexp_match("^([0-9]+)[LCRWSGHU]? ?[-,;\\/] ?([0-9]+)[LCRWSGHU]?$", tag("ref")), 1)) != 18)]!.runwayDesignatorOrderIssue {
|
|---|
| 25 | group: tr("runway reference");
|
|---|
| 26 | set global180RuleIssue;
|
|---|
| 27 | throwError: tr("numbers don''t follow the 180 degree rule (global version)");
|
|---|
| 28 | assertMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=\"01 -02R\"";
|
|---|
| 29 | assertMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=17W-36W";
|
|---|
| 30 | assertMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=\"01/ 01\"";
|
|---|
| 31 | assertMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=03H/12H";
|
|---|
| 32 | assertNoMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=01-19";
|
|---|
| 33 | assertNoMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=\"3 / 21\"";
|
|---|
| 34 | assertNoMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=09L/27R";
|
|---|
| 35 | }
|
|---|
| 36 |
|
|---|
| 37 | /* raising error only if {second designator - first designator != 180} [American version] */
|
|---|
| 38 | way[aeroway=runway][ref =~ /^([0-9]{1,3}[LCRWSGHU]? ?[-,;\/\\] ?[0-9]{3}[LCRWSGHU]?)$/][eval(to_int(get(regexp_match("^([0-9]+)[LCRWSGHU]? ?[-,;\\/] ?([0-9]+)[LCRWSGHU]?$", tag("ref")), 2)) - to_int(get(regexp_match("^([0-9]+)[LCRWSGHU]? ?[-,;\\/] ?([0-9]+)[LCRWSGHU]?$", tag("ref")), 1)) != 180)]!.runwayDesignatorOrderIssue {
|
|---|
| 39 | group: tr("runway reference");
|
|---|
| 40 | set american180RuleIssue;
|
|---|
| 41 | throwError: tr("numbers don''t follow the 180 degree rule (American version)");
|
|---|
| 42 | assertMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=170W-360W";
|
|---|
| 43 | assertMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=\"10/ 100\"";
|
|---|
| 44 | assertMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=30H/120H";
|
|---|
| 45 | assertNoMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=10-190";
|
|---|
| 46 | assertNoMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=\"30 / 210\"";
|
|---|
| 47 | assertNoMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=09L/27R";
|
|---|
| 48 | }
|
|---|
| 49 |
|
|---|
| 50 | /* offer heading separator fix */
|
|---|
| 51 | way[aeroway=runway][ref =~ /^([0-9]{1,3}[LCRWSGHU]? [-,;\/\\][0-9]{1,3}[LCRWSGHU]?)$/]!.runwayDesignatorOrderIssue!.global180RuleIssue!.american180RuleIssue,
|
|---|
| 52 | way[aeroway=runway][ref =~ /^([0-9]{1,3}[LCRWSGHU]?[-,;\/\\] [0-9]{1,3}[LCRWSGHU]?)$/]!.runwayDesignatorOrderIssue!.global180RuleIssue!.american180RuleIssue,
|
|---|
| 53 | way[aeroway=runway][ref =~ /^([0-9]{1,3}[LCRWSGHU]? [-,;\/\\] [0-9]{1,3}[LCRWSGHU]?)$/]!.runwayDesignatorOrderIssue!.global180RuleIssue!.american180RuleIssue {
|
|---|
| 54 | group: tr("runway reference");
|
|---|
| 55 | assertMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=\"09L /27R\"";
|
|---|
| 56 | assertMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=\"09L/ 27R\"";
|
|---|
| 57 | assertNoMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=09L/27R";
|
|---|
| 58 | throwWarning: tr("values can be value can be prettified, separator");
|
|---|
| 59 | fixAdd: concat("ref=", eval(get(regexp_match("^([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?) ?[-,;\\/] ?([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?)$", tag("ref")), 1) > get(regexp_match("^([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?) ?[-,;\\/] ?([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?)$", tag("ref")), 2)) ? get(regexp_match("^([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?) ?[-,;\\/] ?([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?)$", tag("ref")), 2) : get(regexp_match("^([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?) ?[-,;\\/] ?([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?)$", tag("ref")), 1) , "/",
|
|---|
| 60 | eval(get(regexp_match("^([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?) ?[-,;\\/] ?([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?)$", tag("ref")), 1) > get(regexp_match("^([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?) ?[-,;\\/] ?([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?)$", tag("ref")), 2)) ? get(regexp_match("^([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?) ?[-,;\\/] ?([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?)$", tag("ref")), 1) : get(regexp_match("^([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?) ?[-,;\\/] ?([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?)$", tag("ref")), 2));
|
|---|
| 61 | }
|
|---|
| 62 |
|
|---|
| 63 | /* offer heading order fix */
|
|---|
| 64 | way[aeroway=runway].runwayDesignatorOrderIssue!.global180RuleIssue!.american180RuleIssue {
|
|---|
| 65 | group: tr("runway reference");
|
|---|
| 66 | throwError: tr("designators should be in increasing order");
|
|---|
| 67 | fixAdd: concat("ref=", eval(get(regexp_match("^([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?) ?[-,;\\/] ?([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?)$", tag("ref")), 1) > get(regexp_match("^([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?) ?[-,;\\/] ?([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?)$", tag("ref")), 2)) ? get(regexp_match("^([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?) ?[-,;\\/] ?([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?)$", tag("ref")), 2) : get(regexp_match("^([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?) ?[-,;\\/] ?([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?)$", tag("ref")), 1) , "/",
|
|---|
| 68 | eval(get(regexp_match("^([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?) ?[-,;\\/] ?([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?)$", tag("ref")), 1) > get(regexp_match("^([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?) ?[-,;\\/] ?([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?)$", tag("ref")), 2)) ? get(regexp_match("^([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?) ?[-,;\\/] ?([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?)$", tag("ref")), 1) : get(regexp_match("^([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?) ?[-,;\\/] ?([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?)$", tag("ref")), 2));
|
|---|
| 69 | }
|
|---|
| 70 |
|
|---|
| 71 | /* offer heading leading zero fix (except USA, Mexico) */
|
|---|
| 72 | way[aeroway=runway][outside("US,MX")][ref =~ /^([0-9]{1}[LCRWSGHU]? ?[-,;\/\\] ?[0-9]{1,3}[LCRWSGHU]?)$/]!.runwayDesignatorOrderIssue!.global180RuleIssue!.american180RuleIssue {
|
|---|
| 73 | group: tr("runway reference");
|
|---|
| 74 | assertMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=9L/27R";
|
|---|
| 75 | assertNoMatch: "way aeroway=runway ref=09L/27R";
|
|---|
| 76 | throwWarning: tr("values can be value can be prettified, leading zero");
|
|---|
| 77 | fixAdd: concat("ref=0", get(regexp_match("^([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?) ?[-,;\\/] ?([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?)$", tag("ref")), 1), "/", get(regexp_match("^([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?) ?[-,;\\/] ?([0-9]+[LCRWSGHU]?)$", tag("ref")), 2));
|
|---|
| 78 | }
|
|---|